FoodBud
RankingsInsightsMixue SeriesArchiveMethodologyData中文
RankingsInsightsMixue SeriesArchiveMethodologyData中文
FoodBud

Global foodservice chain intelligence. Every figure should link back to a source.

RankingsInsightsMixue SeriesArchiveMethodologyDataPrivacyDisclaimer

FoodBud is for information and research workflow support only. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Privacy practices and data limitations are described in the Privacy Policy and Disclaimer.

When revenue is the store-level scale: how to read Darden

Single-operator read of Darden's FY2025 figures. The bases below are kept separate on purpose and are not comparable across operators on different bases. Source: S1, Darden FY2025 Form 10-K. Information only, not investment advice.

Darden looks odd in a system-sales leaderboard because its main scale row is not franchise GMV. It is $12.0767B of FY2025 company-operated restaurant revenue.

That basis is not a mistake. Darden reported 2,159 company-owned or operated restaurants at fiscal year-end, with only 85 U.S. franchised restaurants, 69 franchised restaurants outside the U.S., and 5 managed or contractual restaurants in the filing context. In other words, the operating estate is overwhelmingly direct.

For a franchise-heavy group, GAAP revenue is often the wrong consumer-demand scale. Franchise fees, royalties, and company revenue can be much smaller than the terminal sales running through the restaurants. For Darden, the logic is different: the company operates the restaurants, so restaurant revenue sits much closer to store-level consumer spending. Strictly, the $12.0767B is Darden's GAAP total-revenue line, but because the estate is nearly all company-operated and franchise revenue is immaterial, that total revenue approximates company-operated operating scale — unlike a franchisor, where system sales and GAAP revenue sit far apart.

That is why FoodBud keeps Darden's scale as company_operated_revenue, not gmv_or_system_sales_usd. The value can sit in the same operating-scale conversation, but the basis badge has to stay visible.

The brand rows show the same point. Olive Garden contributed $5.2129B of company-operated revenue and 935 restaurants. LongHorn Steakhouse contributed $3.0255B and 591 restaurants. The Fine Dining segment had 182 restaurants, while the Other Business segment had 451 restaurants, but FoodBud does not allocate sales to individual brands inside those two segments unless a clean source appears.

Profit is the fourth basis. Darden reported $1.0496B of FY2025 GAAP net income. That is the earnings layer — it is not company revenue, not system sales, and not a scale metric. Store count, company-operated revenue, the franchise system-sales contrast, and net income are four separate reads, and the discipline is to keep them layered rather than collapsed into one number.

The right read is not "Darden is smaller or larger than a franchisor because revenue says so." The right read is: Darden is a direct-operator group, so company-operated revenue is the cleanest locked scale signal. A Burger King, Yum!, or RBI row built on system-wide sales is measuring a different layer.

Evidence pack — every number, with basis and source

MetricValueBasis (`scale_basis`)PrecisionConfidenceSource
Store count (company-owned/operated)2,159company_operated_restaurant_countsource-backedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
— U.S. franchised (context)85franchised_restaurant_countsource-backedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
— International franchised (context)69franchised_restaurant_countsource-backedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
— Managed / contractual (context)5managed_or_contractual_restaurant_countsource-backedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
Operating scale$12.0767Bcompany_operated_revenue — GAAP total revenue ≈ company-operated (nearly all direct; franchise revenue immaterial)as-reportedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
GAAP net income$1.0496Bgaap_net_income_usd (4th basis)as-reportedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
Olive Garden$5.2129B · 935company_operated_revenue · company_operated_restaurant_countsource-backedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
LongHorn Steakhouse$3.0255B · 591company_operated_revenue · company_operated_restaurant_countsource-backedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
Fine Dining segment182 restaurantscompany_operated_restaurant_countsource-backedsource-backedS1 [^dri]
Other Business segment451 restaurantscompany_operated_restaurant_countsource-backedsource-backedS1 [^dri]

[^dri]: S1 — Darden Restaurants FY2025 Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR, fiscal year ended 2025-05-25): dri-20250525.htm (opens in new tab). Store counts and segment/brand rows from Item 1 Business and Note 6 Segment Information; the $12.0767B is the consolidated total-revenue ("Sales") line; net income from the consolidated statements of earnings (Net earnings $1,049.6M). Basis guard locked via FoodBud saas-export-2026-06-08-gh091 (S2).

Basis discipline — why these lines must stay separate

  • Store count is basis-free — Darden's estate is overwhelmingly company-operated; the franchised/managed units are context, not enough to make Darden a franchise-system-sales row.
  • The $12.0767B is GAAP total revenue, but for a nearly all company-operated estate it approximates company-operated operating scale — keep the company_operated_revenue badge visible; do not put it head-to-head with, or rank it against, franchisor system-sales / GMV rows, and do not relabel it as disclosed system sales.
  • Net income ($1.0496B) is the profitability signal — profit is not a scale metric; do not nakedly compare it with another operator's net income.
  • This is a single-operator article. Darden is not compared with any other operator on a different basis, and market capitalization is intentionally omitted.

Related: Darden Restaurants company card (opens in new tab).

Source: S1, Darden FY2025 Form 10-K; S2, FoodBud gh091 locked export. Information only, not investment advice.